Purchase this item to leave a review!

• jorge esparza

  27 days ago

  it works. that's the best i can say about it. it's fast and if your only concern is vertex distribution, it absolutely does its job.
  but quadriflow does a similar job and it's already there in blender. the only advantage is quadriflow often fails and so far retopoloco hasnt failed. this could be a huge win for some.
  for those who cant afford quadremesher, the price is a steal, i hope it stays like that, and it does work as intended for organic or simple meshes. and i really can't complain on the pricetag.
  but if you have hard surface slopes, curves, or ramps, the results are awful. same if you have small details with large open areas, because it's not really adaptive.
  so if you are on the verge, try this, rotate the default cube in edit mode, 45° on x and y so it stands diagonally. then use a remesh modivier. if you are ok with the results, you will be ok using retopoloco, since it does has a bettter flow than the default remesher.
  maybe if it would take normals or angles as a guide it would be ok. but it doesnt.

• 

  Michael Compton

  27 days ago

  Hi jorge, thank you for leaving an honest review. I agree with everything you've said here. It has good use cases for dense organic things but isn't the best at hard surface currently. That is something I am working on improving, and plan to make it better in the future. As far as price, it will always stay at this rate, and all future releases will be free to anyone who owns it. Hopefully you find some good use cases for it. I will work on hard surface results as well as better symmetrical results. Appreciate the honest review and the support.

• Displaying 1 rating